Four tools with mixed quality. search_ops and call_op have solid schemas and descriptions (10-50 word range, clear intent). search_tools and execute_typescript lack output schema documentation, critical for agents planning downstream calls. All tools have descriptions and input schemas, but parameter descriptions are sparse (e.g., execute_typescript's 'code' param lacks format/safety constraints in description). No error handling guidance visible. Tool composition is reasonable (discovery + execution pattern), but output structures are undocumented.

• Document output schemas for search_tools and execute_typescript. Specify: search_tools returns array of {name, signature, description, params}; execute_typescript returns {result, stdout, stderr, executionTimeMs}.
• Add safety constraints to execute_typescript description: 'Sandbox: no filesystem, network, or process access. 30-second timeout. Allowed imports: [list]. Errors: TimeoutError, SyntaxError, RuntimeError with stack trace.'
• Add error handling guidance to all tools. E.g., call_op: 'Returns {code, message, status, retryAfterSeconds} on failure. Retryable: 429, 5xx. User-fixable: 400, 401, 403. Fatal: 404.'
• Expand search_tools description to explain output format: 'Returns array of TypeScript function signatures. Each signature includes operation slug, parameters with types, and return type. Use these to construct execute_typescript code.'
• Document call_op input validation: 'The input object is validated against the operation's schema. Extra fields are ignored. Missing required fields return 400 with field names and constraints.'