NOIZ LAB demonstrates strong schema completeness and parameter documentation across 10 tools. All tools have descriptions (avg 180 chars, within baseline 194). Input schemas are comprehensive with proper JSON Schema types, enums, and constraints. However, output schemas are entirely undocumented, no tool describes what it returns, forcing LLMs to infer structure. Tool naming is domain-specific but occasionally ambiguous (e.g., 'generate_storyboard' could mean create or fetch). Error handling is minimal; no recovery guidance or actionable error messages visible in code. Security: no evidence of secret injection for endpoint/outDir parameters that accept URLs and file paths.

• Document output schema for every tool. Example for create_project_from_brief: 'Returns {project: <NOIZ LAB Project JSON>, plan: {preset: string, ratio: string, cutCount: number, totalDuration: number}}'.
• Add error handling guidance to generate_missing_assets and render_project: 'If endpoint is unreachable, returns error with retry guidance. Timeout defaults to 300s; adjust timeoutMs if generation takes longer.'
• Clarify parameter dependencies in descriptions. For generate_storyboard: 'If project is omitted, storyboard must include all styling details. If project is provided, storyboard overrides its timeline but inherits styleBible unless explicitly changed.'
• Rename 'generate_storyboard' to 'create_storyboard_from_brief' or add explicit description: 'Creates a new storyboard (does not fetch existing). Optionally integrates with an existing project.'
• Add format constraints to endpoint and outDir: 'endpoint must be a valid HTTPS URL (e.g., https://image-effector.example.workers.dev). outDir must be an absolute or relative filesystem path with write permissions.'