Taiwan Geology MCP has well-structured tool definitions with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern: query_, get_) and complete input schemas using Zod validation. All 5 tools have descriptions in Chinese, though they are brief (20-40 chars) and lack LLM-optimized context about when to use each tool vs. alternatives. Parameter descriptions are present but minimal. Output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or know what fields to expect. No error handling guidance, no pagination support despite tools returning potentially large result sets (e.g., nearby faults, sensitive areas). Tools follow single-responsibility principle well. Missing: output schema documentation, error recovery guidance, parameter constraints (enums for alert_level, county validation).

• Document output schemas for all 5 tools. Example: 'Returns {liquefaction_level: "high"|"medium"|"low", confidence: number, data_source: string}'. This enables LLMs to plan chaining and extract the right fields.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50-150 chars with clear intent. Example: 'query_liquefaction_potential: Query soil liquefaction risk at a coordinate. Use this to assess earthquake-induced ground failure hazard before querying fault proximity. Returns risk level (high/medium/low) and confidence score.'
• Add error recovery guidance. Example: 'If coordinate is outside Taiwan, returns error with nearest valid region. If data unavailable, returns null with timestamp of last update.'
• Declare 'alert_level' as enum: {type: 'string', enum: ['red', 'yellow', 'all']} and add validation for 'county' against known Taiwan county names.
• Add pagination to spatial query tools (get_active_faults_nearby, query_sensitive_areas). Accept 'limit' (default 20, max 100) and 'offset' parameters; return 'total_count' and 'has_more' in response.