Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool 1 (tools/list) has a minimal description (47 chars) and sparse schema with only a cursor parameter lacking description. Tool 2 (dynamic tools) is inferred from code comments rather than explicit registration, tool names, descriptions, and schemas are generated at runtime from an external API, making them invisible in static analysis. The codebase contains extensive schema patching logic (transformInputSchema, transformResponseFormat) suggesting the Wordware API returns malformed schemas that the MCP server must repair. No error handling guidance, no output schema documentation, no parameter validation rules, and no security controls visible. The server acts as a thin proxy to an external API without adding MCP-compliant structure.

• Explicitly register all tools in src/index.ts with full schemas, descriptions, and parameter annotations. Do not rely on runtime API responses to define tool contracts, MCP tools must be statically discoverable.
• Expand tools/list description to 100 - 200 chars: 'Fetches the list of available tools from the Wordware API. Call this first to discover what tools are available before executing them. Returns tool names, descriptions, and input schemas. Supports pagination via cursor.'
• Add a description to the cursor parameter: 'Pagination cursor returned by a previous call to tools/list. Omit for the first page.'
• Document the output schema for tools/list: an object with fields like tools (array of {name, description, inputSchema}), nextCursor (string or null), and totalCount (number).
• Remove or document the schema patching logic. If the Wordware API returns malformed schemas, either fix them upstream or add explicit error handling with recovery guidance (e.g., 'Schema validation failed for tool X. Check the Wordware API response format.').