Three tools with basic schemas and minimal descriptions. All tools have input schemas (Zod-validated), but descriptions are generic and lack context for LLM selection. Parameters lack descriptions entirely, 'projectName' and 'path' have no guidance on format, constraints, or when to use them. No output schema documentation. Error handling returns JSON but provides no recovery guidance. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (list_*, read_*) but descriptions don't explain WHEN to call each tool or what distinguishes them. No pagination, no field documentation, no chaining IDs for downstream calls.
Lists all the files inside a Unity project.
Lists all available Unity projects.
Reads the contents of a file inside a Unity project.
All parameters lack descriptions. 'projectName' and 'path' have no guidance on format, constraints, or examples. LLMs cannot infer whether 'path' is absolute, relative, or a project-relative path.
Tool descriptions are generic and under 50 characters. 'Lists all available Unity projects' does not explain when to call this vs list_files_in_project, what structure is returned, or whether it requires Unity Hub to be installed.
No output schema documented. Callers cannot know what fields list_projects returns (e.g., does it return {title, path, version} or a flat array?). read_file returns raw file content with no metadata.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 44 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Error messages provide no recovery guidance. 'Failed to list Unity projects' tells the LLM nothing, should it retry, check permissions, or call a different tool?
list_files_in_project returns a flat array of file paths with no pagination, count, or filtering options. Large projects could return thousands of files, exhausting context.