SkriptHub MCP server has well-defined tool names following verb_noun convention (get_*, search_*), but suffers from critical gaps in parameter descriptions and output schema documentation. All 7 tools have schemas with proper types, but 4 tools lack parameter descriptions entirely. No output schemas are documented, forcing LLMs to guess response structure. Error handling is minimal, no recovery guidance or actionable error messages. The server reads from a public API (SkriptHub) with no destructive operations, but lacks the documentation depth expected for production use.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example: 'Returns array of {id: number, name: string, author: string, url: string}'. Include which fields are IDs needed for downstream calls.
• Add parameter descriptions to search_syntax (search: 'Free-text query for syntax name/description', addon: 'Filter by addon name', addon_id: 'Filter by addon numeric ID', type: 'Filter by syntax type: event|condition|effect|expression|type|function|section|structure').
• Implement pagination: add limit (1-100, default 20) and offset (default 0) parameters to get_addons, get_addon_syntax, get_supporting_plugins, search_syntax, get_tutorials. Return total_count in response.
• Enhance error handling: catch AxiosError and return structured errors like '{"error": "not_found", "message": "Syntax ID 999 not found. Try search_syntax() to find valid IDs."}' with actionable recovery steps.
• Expand tool descriptions to 80-150 chars. Example: 'Search Skript syntax elements by name, addon, or type. Returns matching syntax with IDs, patterns, and compatibility info. Use get_syntax() to fetch full details for a specific ID.'