Four tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. All tools are READ_ONLY and stateless. Naming follows verb_noun convention (list_, get_). Descriptions exist but are brief (60-90 chars, below the 194-char baseline). Critical issue: no output schemas documented, no parameter descriptions for most inputs, and no error recovery guidance. The server loads a YAML profile but does not validate or document the expected structure. Tool composition is reasonable (each does one thing), but parameter constraints are minimal.

• Add explicit output schemas to all tools. Document fields, types, and examples. E.g., list_agents should return {agents: [{name: string, reliability: number, bestFor: string}], total: number}.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format/constraint guidance. E.g., taskDescription: 'Brief description (1-500 chars) of the coding task. Avoid example repo names; use actual project identifiers.'
• Implement error recovery hints. When get_repo_harness fails, return available repo names: 'No harness for "XYZ". Available: ["FrankX", "SIS", "Arcanea"]'.
• Add pagination to list_agents: accept limit (1-100, default 20) and offset/cursor parameters. Return {agents: [...], total: N, hasMore: boolean}.
• Validate YAML profile on load. Return structured error with schema violations, not silent fallback. E.g., 'Profile missing required field: workstation.capacityGuidelines.maxParallelSessions'.