Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool definitions are inferred from Java code rather than explicitly registered with schemas. No input schemas visible for any tool. Descriptions are present but minimal (10-50 chars). Parameters lack type definitions and descriptions. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. This server appears to be a Spring Boot application with MCP client dependencies, but the actual MCP server implementation and tool registration mechanism are not visible in the provided source. The three tools (moveTask, get_file_contents, issue_write) are referenced in AnalystAgent.java but their formal MCP registration, schemas, and parameter documentation cannot be verified.

• Create explicit MCP tool registration with full JSON Schema for each tool. Define input schemas with type, description, and constraints for every parameter (e.g., statusName as enum: ['open', 'in_progress', 'closed']).
• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 characters. Example: 'moveTask: Move a GitHub project issue to a new status. Requires project item ID and target status name. Returns updated item ID and new status. Use after fetching available statuses via list_project_statuses.'
• Add parameter descriptions. Example: 'itemId (string, required): The GitHub project item ID (e.g., PVTI_kwDOBx...). Obtain from list_project_items or search_issues.'
• Document output schemas. Example: 'moveTask returns {item_id: string, status: string, updated_at: ISO8601}. Suitable for chaining to get_issue_details(issue_id).'
• Add error handling guidance. Example: 'If status not found, call list_project_statuses() to see valid options. If permission denied, verify GitHub App has write:project scope.'