Server exposes 8 tools with mixed quality. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (search_tools, get_tool_details, execute_dynamic_tool), which is good. However, descriptions are present but generic (avg ~80 chars, below 194-char baseline). Critical gap: input schemas are NOT visible in the provided source code, only parameter names and types are listed in the summary, not actual JSON Schema definitions. Cannot verify schema completeness, constraints (enums, patterns, min/max), or output schemas. Tool descriptions lack WHEN-to-use guidance and dependency hints. No evidence of error handling patterns or recovery guidance in tool definitions. Composition is reasonable (separate search, get, execute tools), but parameter descriptions are minimal.

• Provide complete JSON Schema definitions for all tools in source code. Include type, description, enum constraints, min/max bounds, and pattern validation for every parameter.
• Standardize tool naming to snake_case across all tools (rename ListTools → list_tools, ExecuteTool → execute_tool, etc.) to avoid LLM confusion and follow MCP conventions.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 characters. Add WHEN-to-use guidance: 'Use get_tool_details to retrieve the full input schema and metadata for a specific tool. Call this after search_tools returns a tool ID you want to inspect.'
• Document parameter constraints in descriptions: 'limit (integer, 1-100, default 20): Maximum number of results per page.' Include format, range, and default for every parameter.
• Add error handling guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'Returns 404 if tool not found. Try search_tools() to verify the tool ID exists.' Include retryability classification for each tool.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry