Two tools with clear, action-verb names (search_routes, show_route) and reasonable descriptions (97 - 115 chars, within baseline 34 - 392). Input schemas present with type definitions and constraints (page_size 1 - 20, page ≥1). However, parameter descriptions are sparse or missing: 'verb' and 'path' in show_route lack descriptions entirely; search_routes params lack guidance on what 'controller' fragment matching does. Output schema is undocumented, LLMs cannot infer what fields to expect from search results or show_route responses. Error handling is basic (tool_error returns JSON with 'ok: false' and 'error' message) but lacks recovery guidance or categorization. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint). Composition is sound, two focused, single-responsibility tools with clear verb-noun naming.

• Document output schema for both tools. Example: search_routes returns {total: number, items: [{verb, path, action, controller, file, line}], page: number, page_size: number}. show_route returns {verb, path, action, controller, file, line}.
• Add descriptions to all parameters. E.g., 'verb': 'HTTP method (GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE, etc.)', 'path': 'Exact route path to look up, e.g. /products/:id', 'controller': 'Controller name fragment for filtering, e.g. Admin matches AdminController'.
• Add tool annotations: readOnlyHint: true and idempotentHint: true to both tools (both are safe read-only operations).
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Route not found: GET /nope. Try search_routes(verb="GET", path_contains="nope") to find similar routes.' and 'Missing required parameter: verb. Must be one of: GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE, PUT, HEAD, OPTIONS.'
• Clarify pagination behavior in search_routes description. E.g., 'Returns paginated results (default 8 per page, max 20). Use page parameter to iterate. Returns total count for planning.'.