Server has 6 tools with basic Zod schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (list_, get_, search_, test_). However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), lack context on WHEN to use each tool, and parameter descriptions are sparse. Schemas are present but lack constraints (enums, ranges, patterns). No output schema documentation. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance or categorization. The test_api tool accepts 'any' type for body, which is unsafe. Overall: functional but below production baseline.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it (vs similar tools), and what structure it returns. E.g., 'List all API projects in Eolink. Call this first to discover available projects before fetching individual APIs. Returns array of {id, name, description, createdAt}.'
• Document output schemas explicitly. Add a comment above each tool handler showing the return structure: e.g., '// Returns: {projects: [{id: string, name: string, description: string}]}'
• Add pagination to list_projects and list_apis: accept limit (1-100, default 20) and offset parameters. Return {items: [...], total: number, hasMore: boolean}.
• Wrap test_api body parameter in z.object() or z.record(z.any()) with description: 'Request body as JSON object. Structure depends on the API endpoint, refer to API documentation.'
• Add error handling: catch exceptions in tool handlers and return structured errors with recovery hints. E.g., 'Project not found. Call list_projects() to see available projects.'