TuskPoint defines 12 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern: checkpoint_*), clear descriptions (avg ~120 chars), and complete input schemas with typed parameters. However, output schemas are entirely undocumented, no tool declares what it returns, forcing LLMs to infer structure. Parameter descriptions are present but often minimal (e.g., 'The thread to read from' lacks format/constraint details). Error handling is absent: no guidance on retryability, recovery steps, or actionable error messages. Missing tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) despite clear risk classifications in metadata. No pagination support documented despite tools like checkpoint_list that could return large result sets.

• Add output schema documentation to every tool. For checkpoint_list, document: {checkpoints: [{id: string, timestamp: string, metadata: object}], total: number}. For checkpoint_load, document: {state: object, checkpoint_id: string, timestamp: string}.
• Annotate tools with risk hints: add destructiveHint=true to checkpoint_rollback, checkpoint_fork; add readOnlyHint=true to checkpoint_load, checkpoint_list, checkpoint_search, checkpoint_verify, checkpoint_resume, checkpoint_diff.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format constraints. E.g., 'thread_id (string, UUID format, required)' and 'checkpoint_id (string, hex-encoded, optional; if omitted loads latest)'.
• Add error handling guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., checkpoint_load: 'Returns error if checkpoint_id not found in thread. Try checkpoint_list to discover valid IDs.'
• Document pagination for checkpoint_list and checkpoint_search: add limit (default 20, max 100) and offset/cursor parameters; return total_count in response.