Server has 5 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. All tools have descriptions (10-50 chars, mostly short), and input schemas are present with Zod validation. However, descriptions lack depth, they state WHAT but not WHEN or WHY to use each tool. Parameter descriptions are minimal (e.g., 'ID of the memory to delete' for delete-memory). No output schemas documented. Error handling returns generic text responses without recovery guidance. No pagination for get-all-memories or search-memories despite potentially large result sets. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint). Naming is clear and verb-first, but composition could be tighter.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHEN to use (e.g., 'Call this to find memories by keyword or tag before retrieving all memories') and any prerequisites.
• Document output schemas explicitly. Define response structure: e.g., store-memory returns {id: string, createdAt: string}; search-memories returns {memories: [{id, content, tags, createdAt}], total: number}.
• Add pagination to search-memories and get-all-memories. Accept limit (1-100, default 20) and offset/cursor parameters. Return total count and next_cursor for chaining.
• Add tool annotations via server.tool() metadata: mark delete-memory with destructiveHint=true; mark search-memories and get-all-memories with readOnlyHint=true.
• Improve error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Failed to store memory: content too long (max 10000 chars). Try shortening the content.' or 'Memory ID not found. Call get-all-memories to list available IDs.'