LayrShift exposes 6 tools with mixed quality. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (create-, delete-, edit-, disable-) which is good. However, parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely. Input schemas are present but lack depth, many parameters have no description text. Output schemas are not documented. Error handling guidance is absent. The server targets dev/staging WordPress environments with high-risk operations (delete-file, create-admin-access-link), yet lacks confirmation patterns or dry-run support for destructive actions. Tool descriptions are adequate (50-100 chars) but parameter-level documentation is weak.

• Add explicit output schema documentation for each tool. Example for create-admin-access-link: {token: string, expires_at: ISO8601, session_expires_at: ISO8601, admin_url: string}.
• Expand parameter descriptions with format/constraint guidance. E.g., 'path: File or directory path (absolute or relative to WordPress root; no symlinks; max 255 chars).'
• Implement dry-run or confirmation pattern for delete-file and edit-file. Return a preview of changes and require explicit confirmation before applying.
• Document error scenarios and recovery guidance in tool descriptions. E.g., 'If path does not exist, returns 404 with available parent directories. If permission denied, returns 403, check WordPress file permissions.'
• Add per-parameter type hints and enums where applicable. E.g., destination in create-upload-link should be an enum: ['uploads', 'custom'] with conditional validation of custom_path.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry