Three tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. search_code has reasonable parameter descriptions (query, language, file_path_contains, top_k), but lacks output schema documentation. index_repo and get_index_status have minimal parameter detail. No tool descriptions explain error cases, prerequisites, or recovery paths. Naming is verb-forward (search_, index_, get_) which is good, but descriptions are generic (194-char baseline suggests these are below average). No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite index_repo being a WRITE operation. Output structures not documented, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract chaining IDs.

• Document output schema for search_code: return array of {file_path, line_number, code_snippet, relevance_score, language}. Include chaining IDs (file_path) so agents can call downstream tools.
• Add error handling to index_repo description: 'Modifies the code index. Returns success or error with reason (e.g., path not found, Qdrant unavailable, embedding service timeout). Retryable on network errors.'
• Declare tool annotations: search_code and get_index_status with readOnlyHint=true; index_repo with destructiveHint=true. Enables agent reasoning about side effects.
• Expand get_index_status description to specify output fields: 'Returns {files_indexed: int, chunks_created: int, last_indexed_at: ISO8601, status: "ready"|"indexing"|"error", error_message?: string}'.
• Add parameter constraints to search_code: 'top_k must be 1 - 50 (default 10). If omitted, returns 10 results. Requesting >50 returns error with guidance.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry