Two tools with minimal descriptions and incomplete schemas. quickEcho has a basic description (24 chars) and proper schema. longRunningTool lacks required parameter descriptions, has an empty required array despite 'steps' being used, and its description (67 chars) is vague about behavior. Neither tool documents output structure or error handling. No parameter descriptions exist. Tool names lack action verbs (quickEcho is generic; longRunningTool is compound). No error recovery guidance. Schemas present but incomplete, missing parameter descriptions entirely.

• Rename tools: 'quickEcho' → 'echo_text', 'longRunningTool' → 'run_multi_step_process'. Use verb_noun convention.
• Add parameter descriptions: 'text' (string, max 1000 chars, the message to echo), 'steps' (number, 1-100, number of simulation steps; defaults to 5).
• Document output schema in tool descriptions: 'Returns {isError: boolean, content: [{type: string, text: string}]}'.
• Add error handling: return specific error messages like 'Invalid steps: must be 1-100, got X' instead of generic failures.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars explaining WHAT, WHEN, and WHAT IT RETURNS. E.g., 'Echoes back the provided text unchanged. Use to test connectivity. Returns the echoed text in a content block.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Sampling (deprecated) - integrate directly with the LLM provider API