Three tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (search_, inspect_, download_) which is good. However, parameter descriptions are minimal (e.g., 'Asset URL or slug' lacks format/constraint details), and output schemas are not formally documented. Error handling exists but lacks recovery guidance. The server uses dcc-mcp-core framework which abstracts tool registration, making direct schema verification difficult from source code alone.

• Document output schemas for all three tools. Example for search_kenney_assets: 'Returns {assets: [{title: string, url: string, license_name: string, license_url: string, usage_notice: string}], count: integer}'. This enables LLMs to plan downstream calls.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format constraints. For asset_url_or_slug: 'Asset URL (https://kenney.nl/assets/SLUG) or slug alone (e.g., factory-kit). Slug must be lowercase alphanumeric with hyphens.'
• Add recovery guidance to error messages. Replace 'Failed to inspect Kenney asset' with 'Asset not found or page unreachable. Verify the asset slug exists by calling search_kenney_assets() first.'
• Document search_kenney_assets filtering behavior: 'Fetches page N from Kenney, then filters client-side by query substring match (case-insensitive). Returns up to limit results.'
• Add idempotency note to download_kenney_asset: 'Idempotent: calling twice with same inputs overwrites the output file. Safe to retry on network failure.'