Four tools with minimal descriptions and incomplete schemas. Tool names lack action verbs (status, telemetry, gpio, command). Descriptions are present but vague (10-80 chars, below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline). Input schemas exist for gpio and command but lack proper type annotations and descriptions for all parameters. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. No parameter constraints (enums, ranges) beyond gpio's min/max. The server reads like a hardware control interface with domain-specific jargon rather than an LLM-friendly tool suite.

• Rename tools with action verbs: 'status' → 'get_board_status', 'telemetry' → 'get_latest_telemetry', 'gpio' → 'set_gpio_pin', 'command' → 'send_board_command'.
• Expand descriptions to 50-200 chars. Example: 'get_board_status: Check if the ESP32 board is currently online and connected to the relay. Returns last-seen timestamp and device info. Call this first to verify connectivity before sending commands.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Example for get_board_status: {online: boolean, last_seen: ISO8601 string, device_info: {model, firmware_version, mac_address}}.
• Add parameter descriptions to gpio and command. For gpio: 'pin: GPIO pin number (0-48, see board pinout docs)' and 'level: Pin state (0=LOW, 1=HIGH)'.
• Add error handling guidance in descriptions. Example: 'If the board is offline, wait 5-10 seconds and retry. If a command times out, check board logs via the dashboard.'