24 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern: socialgo_*) and descriptions present. However, critical gaps undermine quality: (1) Input schemas visible but lack detailed parameter descriptions, most params have minimal guidance on format/constraints; (2) Output schemas NOT documented anywhere, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract fields; (3) No error handling guidance, tools return raw API responses without recovery hints; (4) Parameter relationships undocumented (e.g., 'orders' vs 'order' in socialgo_order_status, 'links' vs 'link' in socialgo_mass_order); (5) Tool descriptions average ~100 chars, below the 194-char baseline for A+ tools, lacking WHEN/WHY context. Guest tools (socialgo_guest_*) are slightly better-documented than reseller tools. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) despite clear risk classifications.

• Document output schemas for all 24 tools. For each tool, define the response object structure (fields, types, required). E.g., socialgo_guest_services returns {services: [{id: string, name: string, platform: string, category: string, rate: number, minQuantity: number, maxQuantity: number}], total: number}.
• Add enum constraints to payment method parameters. Replace 'Optional; defaults to first active gateway' with enum: ['mercadopago', 'stripe', 'crypto', 'paypal', 'paytm'] and mark as optional with a default.
• Standardize parameter naming: use singular 'link' and 'order' consistently; if batch operations are needed, use 'order_ids' (array) instead of 'orders' (CSV string). This reduces LLM confusion and enables type safety.
• Add error recovery hints to tool descriptions. E.g., socialgo_service_details: 'If service not found, call socialgo_services() to search by keyword.' This guides multi-step planning.
• Implement tool annotations in MCP registration: mark READ_ONLY tools with readOnlyHint=true, WRITE tools with destructiveHint=true, and idempotent tools with idempotentHint=true. This enables LLMs to reason about safety and retry logic.