Server provides 5 tools with basic descriptions and input schemas. Naming follows verb_noun pattern (qoyod_read_*, qoyod_write_*, qoyod_delete_*). However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), parameter descriptions lack detail on constraints and formats, and output schemas are not documented. Error handling exists but lacks recovery guidance. Tool composition is reasonable (separate read/write/delete), but parameter validation rules are not exposed in descriptions. No evidence of idempotency hints or confirmation patterns for destructive operations.

• Add explicit input schema to qoyod_read_status (currently missing). Define any query parameters or filters.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 characters. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and WHAT it returns. E.g., 'Execute a raw GET request to the Qoyod API. Use this for read-only queries when no specialized tool exists. Returns JSON response from the API endpoint.'
• Add enum constraint to 'method' parameter in qoyod_write_request: {"type": "string", "enum": ["POST", "PUT"]}. Document in description: 'HTTP method (POST for create, PUT for update).'
• Document output schemas for each tool. Specify: response structure, field types, pagination (if applicable), and any metadata fields. Include example responses in comments.
• Add confirmation pattern for destructive operations. Implement a 'dry_run' parameter (boolean, default false) or a separate 'preview_delete_request' tool that shows what would be deleted without executing.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry