Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool definitions are inferred from file paths and risk labels rather than visible in source code. No explicit tool registration, schemas, or descriptions found in provided Rust/Python/C# code. BashTool and FileEditTool are destructive/write operations with no error handling, confirmation patterns, or permission gates. port_manifest and query_engine lack parameter documentation. Descriptions are generic (10-50 chars) and do not explain WHEN to use each tool or what they return. No input validation, no output schema documentation, no pagination support. This server appears to be a code-editing framework, not an MCP server with proper tool definitions.

• Add explicit JSON Schema definitions for all tool inputs. Include type, description, and constraints (enum, pattern, min/max) for every parameter. Example: BashTool.command should be a string with a maxLength and description explaining allowed commands.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 characters. Explain WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it (vs similar tools), and what it returns. Example: 'Execute bash commands in the workspace. Use for file operations, builds, or tests. Returns stdout, stderr, and exit code.'
• Add confirmation/dry-run pattern to FileEditTool and BashTool. Require explicit confirmation before destructive operations, or offer a preview mode. Document this in the description.
• Implement input validation and sanitization for BashTool. Whitelist allowed commands or patterns; reject suspicious input (e.g., pipes to rm, sudo). Return actionable error messages: 'Command rejected: contains pipe to rm. Use FileEditTool to delete files.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify return type (object, array, string), field names, and types. Example: FileReadTool returns {path: string, content: string, size_bytes: number, encoding: string}.