Loading ToolBench
Server has 4 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. All tools have input schemas (Zod-validated) and descriptions present, but descriptions are generic (10-30 chars) and lack actionable context. Parameter descriptions are minimal or absent. No output schemas documented. Error handling returns raw API responses without recovery guidance. Tools lack annotations (destructiveHint, idempotentHint, readOnlyHint). No pagination support despite potential for large results. Security concern: API key injected via environment but no per-request validation or rate limiting.
Describe image tool
Tool to download generated images
Edit image tool
Generate images tool
Tool descriptions are too short (10-30 chars) and lack context. 'Tool to download generated images' and 'Generate images tool' do not explain WHEN to use them, WHAT they return, or dependencies. LLMs cannot reliably select tools with such minimal guidance.
Parameter descriptions are missing or trivial. 'image_file' in edit tool has no description explaining format (file path? URL? base64?). 'mask' parameter has no guidance on expected format or constraints. LLMs cannot infer parameter semantics from names alone.
No output schemas documented. Tools return raw JSON from Ideogram API without specifying what fields agents should expect. Agents cannot plan downstream calls or extract required data reliably.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 45 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Error handling returns raw API errors without recovery guidance. 'API Error: ...' tells the agent nothing about whether to retry, ask the user, or try an alternative tool. No error classification or actionable next steps.
No tool annotations (destructiveHint, idempotentHint, readOnlyHint). Agents cannot determine which tools are safe to retry or have side effects. 'generate' and 'edit' are destructive (create/modify state) but unmarked.