Server has 10 tools with mostly complete schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (deobfuscate, list_modules, get_module, search_modules, etc.). Descriptions are present and reasonably detailed (avg ~150 chars), exceeding the 10-char minimum. All parameters have type definitions and descriptions. However, output schemas are not explicitly documented in the visible code, responses are inferred from implementation. Error handling is minimal; no recovery guidance or actionable error messages visible. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) despite all tools being read-only. Parameter constraints are well-described (e.g., 'Max 50MB', enums for parser), but no explicit validation or error classification patterns. Composition is sound, tools chain logically (deobfuscate → list_modules → get_module). Missing: output schema documentation, error recovery patterns, and tool annotations.

• Add formal output schema definitions to each tool. Document response structure as JSON Schema (e.g., list_modules returns {modules: [{id, path, size, isVendor}], total: number}).
• Add tool annotations: set readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true for all 10 tools to signal safety properties to clients.
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Module ID not found. Call list_modules() to see available IDs.' or 'Invalid regex: <error details>. Use isRegex=false for literal text search.'
• Document regex syntax and flags for search_modules query parameter. Specify whether multiline, case-insensitive, or other flags are supported.
• Consider removing get_help and instead embed detailed usage examples in each tool's description or provide a separate documentation endpoint outside the tool interface.