Tegata is an authorization framework, not a production MCP server. The 4 example tools (ci-status, deploy-staging, deploy-production, delete-logs) are defined in examples/devops-flow.ts but lack visible input schemas, parameter descriptions, and output schema documentation in the provided source. Tool descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars). No parameter type definitions or constraints visible. The TegataServer wrapper intercepts tool calls for approval governance, but the underlying tool definitions do not meet production quality standards. STDIO transport caps protocol readiness at 50.
Read the current CI/CD pipeline status.
Delete CI logs older than 30 days.
Deploy the current build to the production environment.
Deploy the current build to the staging environment.
No input schemas visible for any tool. All 4 tools lack documented parameter types, constraints, and descriptions.
Tool descriptions are under 20 characters and provide no context for LLM selection. 'Read the current CI/CD pipeline status' (50 chars) is minimal; no guidance on when to call vs alternatives, prerequisites, or return structure.
No output schema documentation. LLMs cannot infer what fields ci-status returns, what deploy-staging produces, or how to chain results to downstream tools.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 34 | 2025-06-18+ | v2 |
Destructive tool (delete-logs) lacks confirmation/dry-run pattern. No evidence of approval flow beyond Tegata's proposal mechanism. No rollback guidance in error cases.
Tool definitions inferred from examples/devops-flow.ts but not visible in provided source. Cannot verify actual registration, schema binding, or parameter handling.