Server has 2 unique tools (get_alerts, get_forecast) with basic descriptions and parameter schemas, but significant quality gaps. Descriptions are present but minimal (34-50 chars, below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline). Parameter descriptions exist but lack format/constraint details. No output schemas documented. Error handling returns plain strings without recovery guidance. Tool definitions are visible in source code but lack depth expected for production use.

• Expand tool descriptions to 80-150 chars. Example: 'get_alerts: Retrieves active weather alerts for a US state. Returns event type, severity, affected area, and instructions. Call this to check for warnings before planning outdoor activities.'
• Add output schema documentation. Define return structure: {alerts: [{event: string, area: string, severity: string, description: string, instructions: string}]} for get_alerts; {forecast: [{period: string, temperature: number, windSpeed: string, windDirection: string, detailedForecast: string}]} for get_forecast.
• Add parameter constraints: state enum (CA, NY, TX, ...) or pattern '^[A-Z]{2}$'; latitude/longitude with min/max bounds and format hints.
• Implement structured error responses: return {error: string, recovery: string, retryable: boolean} instead of plain strings. Example: {error: 'Invalid state code', recovery: 'Use 2-letter US state code (e.g., CA, NY)', retryable: false}.
• Remove duplicate tool registrations if present in actual code; verify only 2 unique tools (get_alerts, get_forecast) are exposed.