Server has 4 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions, but quality is inconsistent. Tool names follow verb_noun pattern (generate_*, analyze_*, plan_*) which is good. However, descriptions lack depth on WHEN to use each tool and what downstream actions they enable. Parameter descriptions are present but minimal (10-30 chars). Output schemas are not documented, critical for agent planning. No error handling guidance visible. Risk annotations (WRITE vs READ_ONLY) are present but not integrated into descriptions. Missing idempotency, pagination, and chaining metadata.

• Document output schemas for all 4 tools. Example: generate_3d_model returns {file_path: string, metadata: {dimensions, supports_needed, estimated_print_time}, orientation_optimized: boolean}. This enables agents to chain calls and extract required fields.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 chars with format/constraint details. E.g., 'Visual style (enum: realistic, cartoon, low-poly, technical; default realistic). Affects texture detail and geometry complexity.'
• Add WHEN-to-use guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'Call generate_2d_preview first to validate concept before expensive 3D generation. Useful for iterating on design before committing compute.'
• Implement error handling with recovery paths. E.g., if generate_3d_model fails with 'Invalid description: too vague', suggest 'Try adding material, size, and color details. Example: "A 10cm red plastic cube with rounded edges."'
• Document analyze_printability's file format support, path resolution rules, and expected output fields (e.g., printability_score, recommended_orientation, support_volume_estimate).