Three tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant quality gaps. Tool names follow verb_noun pattern (translate_text, identify_language, transliterate_text) which is good. However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), parameter descriptions contain formatting errors and inconsistencies, and schema definitions have type mismatches (e.g., output_script and numerals_format declared as arrays but descriptions suggest single enum values). No error handling guidance, no output schema documentation, and no indication of what fields are returned. Parameters lack proper constraints and validation messaging.

• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 characters explaining WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and what it returns. Example: 'Translates text between English and Indic languages (Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, etc.). Use when you need to convert user input to a target language. Returns translated_text and detected_source_language.'
• Fix schema type mismatches: if output_script and numerals_format should be single values, change type from 'array' to 'string' and use enum constraints. If they should accept multiple values, clarify in descriptions and provide examples.
• Document output schemas explicitly. Add a note like 'Returns: {translated_text: string, source_language: string, target_language: string}' to each tool description.
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions. Example: 'If target_language is invalid, the tool returns an error listing supported languages. Retry with a valid language code.'
• Implement per-parameter validation with actionable error messages. Instead of 'Invalid argument: target_language=X', return 'Invalid target_language: got "X". Must be one of: ENGLISH, HINDI, BENGALI, GUJARATI, KANNADA, MALAYALAM, MARATHI, ODIA, PUNJABI, TAMIL, TELUGU'.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry