Server has 4 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. All tools have descriptions (10-100 chars, mostly adequate) and input schemas with type definitions. However, parameter descriptions are sparse or missing context. The execute tool lacks clear guidance on dangerous command handling. Output schemas are not documented. Error handling is present but lacks recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint). Naming is reasonable (verb-noun style) but descriptions could be more LLM-optimized per pattern:tool-description baseline (target 50-200 chars; most here are 30-100 chars).

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example for execute: {success: boolean, output: string, executionTime: number, logId: string}. Example for queryCommands: {commands: [{name, description, enabled, dangerous}], total: number}.
• Add tool annotations to tool definitions: execute with destructiveHint=true, queryCommands and getLogs with readOnlyHint=true, configureCommand with destructiveHint=true (when action='delete').
• Expand parameter descriptions to include constraints and context. E.g., 'command (1-200 chars): The command name to execute. Must match an entry in the commands configuration file.' and 'filter: Restrict results to commands with this status (enabled=active, disabled=inactive, dangerous=marked as high-risk).'
• Add pagination to getLogs: include limit (default 50, max 500), offset, and total count in response. Return {logs: [...], total: number, offset: number, limit: number}.
• Enhance error responses with recovery guidance. When execute returns 'Command disabled', add: 'To enable this command, call configureCommand with action=enable.' When dangerous command confirmation fails, return the exact token string required.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry