This is a policy/middleware framework, not a traditional MCP server with user-facing tools. The three example tools (run_command, read_file, fetch_url) are minimal reference implementations. All three have extremely brief descriptions (10-15 chars), no visible input parameter descriptions in schemas, and no documented output schemas. Tool definitions appear inferred from file paths rather than explicitly registered with full schemas. The framework itself is well-engineered for policy enforcement, but the example tools lack production-grade documentation.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Example: 'Execute shell commands with policy enforcement. Supports bash, sh, and zsh. Returns stdout, stderr, and exit code. Use for system tasks like file operations, deployments, or data processing. Requires command policy approval.'
• Add parameter descriptions to all three tools. For run_command: 'command (string): The shell command to execute. Must be a valid bash/sh/zsh command. Supports pipes, redirects, and environment variables. Examples: ls -la /tmp, echo $HOME.'
• Document output schemas. Example for run_command: '{stdout: string, stderr: string, exitCode: number, duration_ms: number}'. For read_file: '{content: string, size_bytes: number, encoding: string, path: string}'.
• Add dry-run support to run_command. Accept optional 'dry_run: boolean' parameter. When true, return what would execute without side effects. Enables safe preview before destructive operations.
• Implement structured error responses with recovery hints. Example: 'Command failed: permission denied. Ensure user has execute permissions. Try: chmod +x <file> or run with appropriate sudo/doas prefix.'