Six tools with complete JSON schemas and parameter descriptions, but significant quality gaps. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (run_subagent, get_task_status, cancel_subagent_run, get_task_result, wait_for_authorization, list_agent_models). Descriptions are present but generic (10-60 chars), lacking WHEN/WHY context and recovery guidance. Parameters have types and descriptions, but many lack constraints (enums, ranges, patterns). No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, no guidance on retryability, user-fixable vs fatal errors, or recovery paths. Security concerns: authorization_request_id and client_id exposed as parameters; no mention of secret injection or permission gates.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., run_subagent returns {run_id: string, status: 'pending'|'running'|'completed'|'failed', result?: string, error?: string}. This enables LLMs to chain calls and extract required fields.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars with WHEN/WHY context. E.g., 'Run a subagent to delegate a task. Use this when the current agent lacks expertise or needs parallel execution. Returns run_id for status polling. Fails if agent is unavailable or prompt is invalid.'
• Add enum constraints to parameters: agent=[auto|codex|claude|antigravity], profile=[inspect|execute|...], mode=[read-only|write|...], session_policy=[auto|persistent|...]. Declare these in JSON Schema, not just descriptions.
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions. E.g., 'If status is pending after timeout_sec, call get_task_status to poll. If authorization_request_id is invalid, wait_for_authorization returns timeout error, user must approve in UI first.'
• Audit authorization_request_id and client_id: if sensitive, move to server-side configuration or environment variables. If not, clarify in descriptions that these are non-secret identifiers. Add permission checks to cancel_subagent_run to prevent unauthorized cancellations.