Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool definitions lack visible input schemas in source code, cannot verify parameter types, constraints, or descriptions. No tool descriptions found in the provided source excerpts. Tool names use hyphens (who-is-on, recent-changes) rather than verb_noun convention (get_team_status, list_recent_changes). The server appears to be a team coordination hub with 13 tools (6 write, 7 read), but without access to actual tool registration code (packages/mcp/src/tools/*.ts files are referenced but not shown), schema quality cannot be assessed. Based on visible code structure alone, this server falls well below production baseline.

• Provide complete tool registration code (packages/mcp/src/tools/*.ts and packages/mcp/src/app.ts) showing input schemas, descriptions, and parameter definitions for all 13 tools.
• Rename tools to verb_noun convention: who-is-on → get_team_status, recent-changes → list_recent_changes, impact-of → get_impact_of, handoffs → list_handoffs, handoff → create_handoff, decide → create_decision.
• Add 50-200 character descriptions to every tool explaining WHAT it does, WHEN to use it, and what it returns. Example: 'Get current team presence and active work assignments. Call this before claiming or releasing work to see who is available.'
• Document all input parameters with type, description, constraints, and examples. Use enums for fixed-value fields (status: open|in_progress|resolved). Specify ranges for numeric params (limit: 1-100).
• For write tools (notify, claim, release, handoff, decide), add error handling guidance: 'If claim fails with 'already_claimed', the work was claimed by another team member. Call who-is-on to see current assignments.' Include retryable vs fatal error classification.