40 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern: get_, list_, search_) and descriptions present for all. However, descriptions are often terse (10-50 chars), falling below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline. Input schemas are visible and typed, but many lack detailed parameter descriptions. Output schemas are not documented. No error handling guidance, no recovery hints, and no actionable error messages. Tool composition is sound (each does one thing), but parameter descriptions are sparse and do not explain constraints, formats, or dependencies. Pagination is implemented (limit, cursor) but not consistently described.

• Expand all tool descriptions to 50-200 characters. Example: 'network_stats' → 'Rolling 24-hour network activity summary: total accounts, operations, payments, trades, trading volume, and XLM metrics. Use to understand current network health and activity trends.'
• Add explicit parameter descriptions for all pagination and filter params. Example: 'limit: Number of results to return (1-100, default 20). Larger limits may slow responses.' and 'order: Sort direction, asc (oldest first) or desc (newest first).'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Add a comment or docstring showing the expected response structure. Example: 'Returns {"account": {...}, "balances": [...], "created_at": "2024-01-15T..."}'.
• Add error handling and recovery hints to tool descriptions. Example: 'If account not found, try search_accounts() with a partial address or domain name.'
• Complete the pool_history description: 'Per-period liquidity pool statistics (volume, fees, share price over time). Use to analyze pool performance and historical trends.'