Two tools with complete, well-structured schemas and clear descriptions. Tool names follow verb_noun pattern (mistral_chat_*). Schemas are comprehensive with proper type definitions, enums, and nested object validation via Zod. Descriptions are adequate (100-150 chars) and explain when to use each tool. However, parameter descriptions are minimal or absent in the schema output, and no output schema is documented. Error handling is absent, no guidance on what happens on API failures, rate limits, or invalid model responses. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) despite both tools being read-only operations.

• Document the output schema explicitly. Add a response type definition showing that both tools return { type: 'text', text: string } and document what the 'text' field contains (e.g., 'The completion text from Mistral's model').
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. Wrap mistral.chat.complete() in try-catch and return structured errors: 'API key invalid' → 'Check MISTRAL_API_KEY environment variable'; 'Rate limited' → 'Retry after 60 seconds'; 'Model not found' → 'Verify model name is one of: mistral-large-latest, mistral-small-latest, pixtral-large-latest, pixtral-12b-2409'.
• Add readOnlyHint: true to both tool definitions in ListToolsRequestSchema. This signals to agents that these tools are safe to call without confirmation.
• Enhance parameter descriptions in the Zod schema. Add descriptions to message role/content fields: role: 'The role of the message sender (system, user, or assistant)', content: 'The message content as a string or array of text/image chunks'.
• Add timeout handling. Set a timeout on mistral.chat.complete() (e.g., 30 seconds) and return a clear error: 'Mistral API request timed out after 30 seconds. Try again or use a simpler prompt.'