Server has 8 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern) and reasonable descriptions (avg ~120 chars). All tools are read-only and well-scoped. However, input schemas lack critical details: no minimum/maximum bounds on numeric parameters, no format specifications for IDs, and output schemas are entirely undocumented. Parameter descriptions are present but generic (e.g., 'Reddit post ID' without format guidance). Error handling is absent from tool definitions. The analyze_opportunities tool accepts a complex nested object but provides no guidance on required vs optional fields or expected output structure.

• Document output schema for every tool. Specify field names, types, and structure. Example: 'Returns array of {title: string, author: string, score: integer, comment_count: integer, permalink: string, created_at: ISO8601}'.
• Add bounds to numeric parameters: 'limit: integer (1-100, default 20)' for get_post_comments. Prevents LLMs from requesting unreasonable result counts.
• Specify post ID format in descriptions: 'post_id: string (alphanumeric, 6 characters, e.g., abc123)' or provide a regex pattern in schema.
• Add error recovery hints to descriptions. E.g., get_subreddit_info: 'If subreddit not found, call search_reddit to discover valid subreddit names.'
• Document analyze_opportunities input schema: specify required fields (title, content) vs optional (author, score), and describe output structure (e.g., array of {opportunity: string, score: float, keywords_matched: array}).

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry