Loading ToolBench
Single tool 'is_odd' has a basic description (89 chars) and proper input schema with type and description. However, the tool name lacks an action verb (should be 'check_if_odd' or 'determine_if_odd'), violating the verb_noun naming convention. No output schema is documented. The tool is trivial (modulo operation) and lacks error handling guidance. Prompts and resources are present but not evaluated as tools. Overall definition quality is below median due to naming anti-pattern and missing output schema documentation.
Determines if a number is odd. Args: num (int): The number to check Returns: bool: True if the number is odd, False otherwise
Tool name 'is_odd' lacks action verb. Should be 'check_if_odd' or 'determine_if_odd' to match verb_noun convention. LLMs infer intent from names, bare adjectives are ambiguous.
No output schema documented. Tool returns bool, but LLMs need explicit schema (e.g., {"type": "boolean", "description": "True if the number is odd, False otherwise"}) to plan downstream actions.
No error handling or input validation guidance. Tool accepts any integer but does not document behavior for edge cases (e.g., very large numbers, negative numbers). No recovery guidance if input is invalid.
Tool description is generic and lacks context for LLM selection. Does not explain WHEN to use this tool or what problem it solves. At 89 chars, it is below the 194-char baseline for production tools.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 42 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |