Both tools have critical definition gaps. 'create-server' has a vague description (58 chars) and an overly broad input schema with a single 'requirements' object lacking internal field documentation. 'get-template' has a minimal description (47 chars) and a single string parameter with no format constraints or examples. Neither tool documents output schemas, error handling, or recovery paths. Parameter descriptions are absent or trivial. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) despite 'create-server' being a destructive write operation. Naming is acceptable (verb_noun pattern), but schema completeness and parameter clarity are far below production baseline (94% of A+ tools have full param descriptions; these have ~0%).

• Expand create-server input schema: replace opaque 'requirements' object with explicit fields (serverName: string, port: number, features: array of enums, authentication: boolean, etc.). Document each field with description, type, and constraints.
• Document output schema for create-server: return {success: boolean, outputDirectory: string, generatedFiles: [string], serverUrl: string, nextSteps: [string]}. Include all fields needed for downstream tool calls or user feedback.
• Add enum constraint to get-template.templateName parameter. List valid template names (e.g., 'basic', 'with-auth', 'with-database', 'with-websocket') in the schema and description.
• Add tool annotations: mark create-server with destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false (file generation is not idempotent). Mark get-template with readOnlyHint=true.
• Add error handling guidance: document what errors can occur (invalid template name, disk full, permission denied) and suggest recovery actions (e.g., 'If template not found, call get-template with no args to list available templates').

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry