Server has 6 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant quality gaps. Tool names follow verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, search_) which is good. However, descriptions are inconsistent: one tool has Dutch text ('Lijst alle sites...'), others are English. Parameter descriptions are minimal (10-30 chars), lacking context on format, constraints, or when to use each tool. The 'requestBody' parameter in search_console_api_searchanalytics_query uses type 'any' with no schema validation, this violates constrained-input pattern. No output schemas documented. Error handling exists but lacks recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, etc.). Overall structure is present but falls short of production quality.

• Standardize all descriptions to English and expand to 50-150 chars. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and any prerequisites. E.g., 'List all Google Search Console properties the authenticated user has access to. Call this first to discover available siteUrl values for other tools.'
• Replace 'requestBody: z.any()' with a proper Zod schema defining the Search Analytics API request structure (dateRange, dimensions, metrics, filters, etc.). Document valid enum values for each field.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., list_sites returns {siteUrl: string, permissionLevel: string}[]. This enables LLMs to extract siteUrl for chaining into list_sitemaps.
• Add enum constraints to category and platform parameters. E.g., category: z.enum(['notFound', 'authPermissions', 'mobileUsability', 'other']).describe('Error category...')
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Invalid siteUrl. Call search_console_api_list_sites to see available properties.' or 'Category must be one of: notFound, authPermissions, mobileUsability, other.'