Two tools with basic verb-noun naming (get_alerts, get_forecast) and minimal descriptions. Both have input schemas with typed parameters and descriptions, meeting baseline requirements. However, descriptions are extremely brief (18-27 chars), falling well below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized range. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. No parameter constraints (e.g., state code validation, lat/lon bounds). Tool composition is reasonable but lacks depth for production use.

• Expand get_alerts description to 80-120 chars: 'Retrieve active weather alerts for a US state. Returns alert type, severity, and affected areas. Call when user asks about weather warnings or hazards.'
• Expand get_forecast description similarly: 'Get 7-day weather forecast for a location (latitude, longitude). Returns daily high/low temps, precipitation chance, and conditions. Call for weather predictions.'
• Add state parameter constraint: enum of 50 US state codes (AL, AK, AZ, ..., WY) or pattern '^[A-Z]{2}$' with description 'Two-letter US state code'.
• Add latitude/longitude bounds in descriptions: 'Latitude: -90 to 90 degrees' and 'Longitude: -180 to 180 degrees'.
• Document output schema for both tools: specify fields returned (e.g., alerts: [{type, severity, description, effective_time, expires_time}], forecast: [{date, high_temp, low_temp, precipitation_chance, condition}]).