Two tools with complete schemas and reasonable descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and error handling guidance. get_alerts and get_vulnerabilities both have proper input schemas with types and descriptions, meeting baseline requirements. However, parameter descriptions lack actionable constraints (e.g., no format specs for ISO 8601 timestamps, no enum values for severity/level fields). Output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot plan downstream operations. Error handling is absent; no guidance on retryability or recovery paths. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (get_*), which is correct. Descriptions are adequate (60-80 chars) but could be more specific about when to use each tool and what data is returned.

• Document output schemas for both tools. Specify fields returned (e.g., alert_id, timestamp, rule_id, severity, agent_id, message) with types and whether they are always present.
• Add enum constraints to 'level' (get_alerts) and 'severity' (get_vulnerabilities). Replace descriptive text with formal enums: level: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] or severity: ['Critical', 'High', 'Medium', 'Low'].
• Specify timestamp format explicitly: 'ISO 8601 format (e.g., 2024-01-15T10:30:00Z)' and add min/max date constraints if applicable.
• Add pagination parameters: offset/cursor and document max result size. E.g., 'Returns up to 100 alerts; use offset to paginate. Total count included in response.'
• Expand tool descriptions to clarify purpose and differentiation. E.g., get_alerts: 'Retrieve security alerts from Wazuh Indexer. Use this to investigate recent security events, filter by rule severity, agent, or time range.' get_vulnerabilities: 'Retrieve detected vulnerabilities from Wazuh Indexer. Use this to assess CVE exposure across agents, filter by severity or CVE ID.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry