Four tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation, output schema clarity, and error handling. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (good), but descriptions are minimal (avg 60 chars, well below 194-char baseline). No parameter descriptions for most inputs. No documented output schemas. No error guidance. No input validation hints. Schemas are present but sparse, parameters lack type info beyond 'string'. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint). Two WRITE tools lack confirmation/dry-run patterns.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100 - 200 characters. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it (vs similar tools), and WHAT it returns. Example: 'Adds a formatted visit report to Salesforce CRM. Use after formatting with format_visit_report prompt. Returns success status and report ID for tracking.'
• Add parameter descriptions with format/constraint hints. For 'visit_report': 'The visit report text (max 5000 chars, plain text or markdown). Should include customer name, participants, content summary, and action items.'
• Document output schemas as structured JSON. Instead of plain text, return {"status": "success", "report_id": "...", "timestamp": "..."}. This enables chaining and parsing.
• Add tool annotations: mark add_visit_report_to_salesforce, process_automatic_order_entry, add_absence_to_hr with destructiveHint=true. Mark get_contingent with readOnlyHint=true.
• Implement input validation and error handling. Validate absence_type against allowed values (holiday, sick, unpaid, etc.). Return structured errors: {"error": "Invalid absence_type", "allowed": ["holiday", "sick", ...], "received": "xyz"}.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry