NiRuLogic exposes 42 tools across HTTP routes and JavaScript API wrappers, but lacks critical definition infrastructure. Go route handlers (tools 1-28) have NO visible input schemas, parameter descriptions, or output documentation in the source. JavaScript API wrappers (tools 30-42) have minimal schemas: only tool 30 (createProgram) shows 2 parameters with basic type/description; tools 31-42 show parameter names and types but descriptions are generic or missing. No tool has documented output schemas. Descriptions are present but often vague ('Handles program listing and creation' for handlePrograms). Error handling is absent from visible code. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (good), but composition issues exist: handleProgramRoute conflates GET/PUT/DELETE into one tool; MCP relay tools (19-22) mix concerns. Security: no visible input validation, secret injection, or permission gates. This server would fail code review by a principal tool engineer.

• Add explicit JSON Schema input definitions to all 42 tools. For Go handlers, define schemas in core_routes.go or a separate schema file. For JS API tools, expand parameter objects with 'type', 'required', and 'properties' fields.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify which fields are returned, their types, and which IDs/references are needed for chaining (e.g., createProgram must return program_id for use in updateProgram).
• Expand parameter descriptions from generic ('Element data') to specific ('Element data object with required fields: type (string: contact|coil|timer), name (string, 1-50 chars), position (object: {x, y})').
• Split handleProgramRoute and handlePluginRoute into separate get_*, update_*, delete_* tools. Each tool should have one clear responsibility.
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. Return structured errors like '{"error": "Program not found", "code": "NOT_FOUND", "suggestion": "Call listPrograms() to see available programs"}' instead of HTTP status codes alone.