Server has solid naming conventions (all tools start with action verbs: list_, search_, read_, get_) and comprehensive parameter schemas with types and descriptions. All 10 tools have descriptions (avg 85 chars, within baseline 34-392). However, output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot predict response structure for planning. Error handling is minimal (mask_error_details=True suppresses details). No per-tool error guidance. Pagination is explicit but cursor handling lacks documentation of what cursors contain or how to interpret them. Security is strong (read-only, no secrets in params, tool annotations present). Composition is clean, each tool has one responsibility.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., 'Returns {workspaces: [{alias: string, label: string, team_id: string}], total: integer}'. Include field types and nested structure.
• Replace mask_error_details=True with detailed, actionable error messages. E.g., 'Workspace "invalid-ws" not found. Available workspaces: [ws1, ws2, ws3]' instead of generic error.
• Add cursor documentation to pagination parameters. E.g., 'cursor: pagination token from previous response; omit or null for first page. Response includes next_cursor if more results exist.'
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format constraints. E.g., 'workspace: workspace alias (alphanumeric, 1-50 chars; call list_workspaces to discover valid aliases)'.
• Add per-tool error handling examples in docstrings. E.g., 'Raises ToolError if workspace not found, channel_id invalid, or rate limited. Retry with exponential backoff.'