Six tools with mixed quality. Most have descriptions (good), but schemas are incomplete or missing parameter descriptions. bridge_status, echo, and slow_operation have minimal or empty input schemas. get_weather and notes lack parameter descriptions for their inputs. failing_tool is a test utility, not production-grade. No tool has documented output schemas. Error handling guidance is absent. Naming is reasonable (verb_noun pattern mostly followed), but parameter documentation is sparse. This server reads as example/demo code rather than production-ready.

• Add complete input schemas to get_weather and bridge_status. If get_weather uses elicitation, document the elicitation flow and what parameters the LLM should provide after elicitation completes.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Example: echo returns {"text": string}, notes returns {"notes": [{"title": string, "content": string}]}, slow_operation returns {"waited_seconds": number}.
• Add descriptions to all parameters. For notes: 'title' (string, required for add/delete actions), 'content' (string, required for add action). For slow_operation: 'seconds' (number 1-60, how long to wait).
• Add error handling guidance. failing_tool should document what error it returns and why. Other tools should explain recovery steps (e.g., 'If bridge_status returns no apps, ensure Elgato app is running').
• Remove or clearly mark test utilities. failing_tool and slow_operation appear to be testing helpers, either remove them from production or add a 'testing_only' flag and description.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry