GitMCP has 4 tools with basic descriptions but significant gaps in schema completeness and parameter documentation. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (fetch_*, search_*), which is good. However, input schemas are minimal or missing type information. fetch_documentation has NO input parameters documented despite being a tool. Descriptions are present but generic (avg ~80 chars), lacking WHEN to use guidance and dependency hints. No output schemas documented. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint). This is a typical community-grade server with foundational issues.

• Add explicit input schema to fetch_documentation (currently empty). Specify if it requires a repository_url or repository_name parameter, or if it operates on a pre-configured repo.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., search_code should return [{file_path, line_number, snippet, relevance_score}] so LLMs know what fields to extract.
• Expand descriptions to 100-150 chars with WHEN-to-use guidance. E.g., 'Search repository code for function definitions, class names, or implementation patterns. Use this when you need to understand how a feature is implemented. Returns file paths and code snippets.'
• Add min/max constraints to numeric parameters. E.g., page: {type: 'number', minimum: 1, description: 'Page number (1-based). Each page contains 30 results.'}
• Add error recovery guidance to descriptions. E.g., 'If the repository is not found, try fetch_documentation first to verify the repo is accessible.'