Single tool 'add' has critical definition gaps. Tool name lacks action verb (should be 'add_numbers' or similar for clarity). Description is minimal (12 chars, below 20-char threshold). Input parameters 'a' and 'b' have NO descriptions (null values visible in schema), violating the requirement that every parameter must have a description. No output schema documented. No error handling guidance. Naming is ambiguous, 'add' alone doesn't clearly signal arithmetic operation vs. other meanings.
Add two numbers
Parameter descriptions missing: 'a' and 'b' have null descriptions. Every parameter must have a non-empty description explaining what it controls.
Tool description too short (12 chars, below 20-char minimum). Expand to 50-200 chars explaining WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and what it returns.
Tool name 'add' lacks action verb clarity. Rename to 'add_numbers' or 'sum_integers' to make intent explicit and match verb_noun convention.
No output schema documented. LLMs need to know what fields to expect (e.g., 'result: integer'). Document return type and structure.
No error handling guidance. If inputs are invalid (non-integer, overflow), tool should return actionable error messages, not stack traces.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 33 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |