13 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. Most tools have 1-5 parameters with type info, but descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars) and lack actionable guidance. No error handling documentation, no output schemas specified, and no tool annotations. Naming is verb-first and clear (get_, move_, place_, break_, etc.), which is a strength. However, parameter descriptions are sparse, e.g., 'X coordinate' tells the LLM nothing about valid ranges, units, or coordinate system. Complex tools like draw-pixel-art lack guidance on blockPalette format or image size limits. No idempotency hints, no retry guidance, no permission scopes declared.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., get-position should return {x: number, y: number, z: number, yaw: number, pitch: number}. get-inventory should return {items: [{name: string, count: number, slot: number}], totalSlots: number}.
• Add min/max bounds and units to numeric parameters. E.g., 'X coordinate (integer, range -30000000 to 30000000, Minecraft world coordinates)' and 'Scale factor (1 - 10, default 1)'.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50 - 150 chars with actionable context. E.g., 'Get the bot's current 3D position and rotation. Use this to verify movement or plan pathfinding. Returns x, y, z coordinates and yaw/pitch angles.'
• Add error recovery hints to tool descriptions. E.g., 'place-block: If the block cannot be placed, the target position may be occupied or non-solid. Use get-block to check the target first.'
• Implement dry-run or confirmation for destructive tools. Add an optional 'confirm' parameter to break-block and attack-entity, or return a confirmation token that must be passed in a follow-up call.