Five tools with basic verb-noun naming (search_packages, package_info, package_dependencies, package_graph, compare_versions). All have descriptions (10-100 chars, below the 194-char baseline). Input schemas present with type definitions and required flags, but parameter descriptions are minimal (10-30 chars vs. 72-char baseline). No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. Tools are read-only (low risk) but lack LLM-optimization for multi-step composition. Schema completeness is moderate; descriptions are sparse.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and any prerequisites. E.g., 'Search for packages by name or partial match in the Alpine package database. Use this to discover available packages before calling package_info for details.'
• Add 50-100 char descriptions to every parameter. For 'query' in search_packages: 'Package name or partial match (e.g., "curl" matches curl, curl-dev, curl-doc). Supports wildcards.'
• Document output schemas for each tool. E.g., search_packages returns [{name, version, description, maintainer}]. package_graph returns {package, dependencies: [{name, version, type}]}.
• Add enum constraint to package_graph 'query_type' parameter. Declare valid values: requires, provides, depends_on, required_by, what_provides.
• Add error handling guidance. E.g., 'If package not found, returns empty result. For graph queries, returns partial results if some dependencies are unavailable.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry