Both tools have minimal descriptions (under 100 chars) and lack parameter descriptions entirely. Schemas are present but sparse. park_quiet and park_progress are testing/diagnostic tools with no real business logic, making them unsuitable for production agent use. Naming is clear (verb_noun pattern), but parameter documentation is absent. No error handling guidance, no output schema documentation, and no indication of what these tools return beyond implicit behavior.

• Add parameter descriptions: 'seconds: Number of seconds to park (1-3600). Must be a positive integer.' and 'every: Interval in seconds between progress notifications (1-seconds). Must be positive and less than or equal to seconds.'
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars explaining purpose: 'park_quiet: Test tool that blocks for N seconds without output, used to measure client timeout tolerance.' and 'park_progress: Test tool that blocks for N seconds, emitting progress notifications every M seconds, used to validate progress handling.'
• Document output schema: specify what each tool returns (e.g., {"status": "completed", "elapsed_seconds": <number>})
• Add error handling guidance: 'If seconds exceeds 3600, returns error: "timeout too long (max 3600s)". If every > seconds, returns error: "interval must not exceed total duration".'
• Clarify use case in description: 'Diagnostic/testing tool only. Not for production agent workflows. Used to validate MCP client timeout and progress handling behavior.'