Single tool 'execute_python' has a reasonable description (194 chars) but critical security and design flaws. Input schema is present with type and description for the 'code' parameter. However, the tool violates fundamental safety patterns: it executes arbitrary Python code without sandboxing, validation, or confirmation. No output schema is documented. The tool is marked IRREVERSIBLE but lacks error handling guidance, recovery patterns, or permission gates. This is a dangerous tool that should never be exposed to untrusted agents without severe restrictions.

• Implement input validation: parse code AST, reject imports/builtins, allowlist only REAPER API calls via the 'reaper' object. Prevent file I/O, network access, and subprocess execution.
• Document output schema explicitly: specify that success returns {"status": "success", "output": string} and errors return {"status": "error", "code": string, "message": string, "suggestion": string}.
• Add confirmation_request pattern: require agents to call a separate 'preview_reaper_code' tool first, which returns a dry-run summary without side effects. Only after confirmation should execute_python proceed.
• Implement error classification: categorize errors as 'syntax_error' (user-fixable), 'api_error' (retryable), 'permission_denied' (fatal), 'timeout' (retryable). Include actionable recovery hints in each error response.
• Rename tool to 'execute_reaper_script' and update description to explicitly state: 'Executes Python code that controls REAPER via the reaper API object. Code is sandboxed to REAPER calls only. Supports multi-line scripts. Returns execution output or error details.'