Two tools with minimal definitions. Both have names and descriptions, but descriptions are extremely brief (18-24 chars, well below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline). Input schemas are present but sparse: 'save' has one string param with description; 'find_all' has empty input. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. No parameter constraints, enums, or validation rules. Tool composition is reasonable (single responsibility), but documentation is insufficient for reliable LLM selection and execution.

• Expand 'save' description to 50-150 chars: 'Save a new product by name. Returns the product ID and confirmation. Fails if name already exists or is empty.'
• Expand 'find_all' description: 'Retrieve all saved products. Returns a list of product objects with ID, name, and creation timestamp. Supports pagination via limit and offset parameters.'
• Add output schema documentation for both tools. Example for save: {type: 'object', properties: {product_id: {type: 'string'}, name: {type: 'string'}, created_at: {type: 'string', format: 'date-time'}}}
• Add pagination to find_all: accept 'limit' (1-100, default 20) and 'offset' (default 0) parameters. Return total_count and next_offset.
• Add error handling: document that save returns 400 with 'Product name already exists' if duplicate, and 400 with 'Product name cannot be empty' if blank. Guide LLM to retry with different name or check existing products first.